Both of the candidates running for President of the American Association of University Professors are self-identfied “contingents.” I am not going to rehash that convo again. Since both of the candidates for president have said that the AAUP needs to increase revenue and then use that money to organize part-time faculty, I thought it would be interesting to look at the AAUP’s balance sheet. To do that, I ventured over the the Department of Labor’s website. Thanks to the current Labor Secretary, all unions have to fill out very detailed forms about how they get their money, and how they spend it. Evidently, when the Secretary implemented these policies, NEA challenged them in court. Thankfully, the union lost the case and now union members and anyone else curious about the finances of non-profit organizations with revenues over $250K per year, can have a look at exactly how an organization is spending its money.
As when I wrote about the AFT, whose officials tell anyone who’ll listen that the union is committed to organizing part-timers, I was looking for the percentage of the AAUP’s annual revenue spent on representational activities. Well, I have to say after looking over the AAUP’s 2007 LM-2 document filed with the Department of Labor, I am left speechless. The organization spent just 1/7th of its revenue on representational activities in 2007. For those of you not teaching developmental math and fractions this semester, that’s 14 percent of the total revenue. Total revenue in 2007 clocked in at $7.1 million dollars. The group spent just $1.01 million dollars on representational activities, including organizing. The staff spent a whopping $4.593 million on general overhead, union administration and benefits for themselves. This means that for every dollar AAUP takes in from dues, 64.6 cents are spent on simply paying staff to run the joint. Any restaurant that served 64.6 percent of its food and drink to the staff would quickly go under. Evidently, at AAUP, they’re very good swimmers.
Contrary to what the two candidates for AAUP presidency claim, AAUP doesn’t need more revenue in order to do more organizing. Spending 64.6 percent of revenue on running an organization, and just 14 percent on the mission of the organization is, well, downright disturbing. Volunteer officers of the organization, in total, were paid around $28,000 in compensation, a pittance, really. On the other hand, there are a handful of staff who earn six-figure salaries, all of them men, and a large number of support staff who earn salaries from the mid $20s to the mid $50s. If unions are about sharing the wealth, at AAUP no one has gotten the memo.
Looking closer at staffing, AAUP member dues supported 42 staff who were paid a total of $1.527 million dollars in salaries in 2007. However, of that total spent on staff salaries, the pay of just five men accounted for 38 percent of the total, or $586,077. No woman employed at AAUP is a member of the 100K boys’ club. The similarities to the system of pay between full-time and part-time faculty are too obvious to pass up. And speaking of part-time faculty, the 45,841 member organization didn’t have any part-time faculty listed on its membership status form.
Current President Cary Nelson signed the financial documents so must be aware of the issues surrounding operational versus representational breakdown. That his goal is to get more money for AAUP without coupling an increase in revenue with pushing for a complete analysis and reorganization of the operational system is sheer folly. It is no wonder AAUP membership is stagnating. Spending just 14 percent of revenue on organizing can lead to little else but stagnation. As reflected in the financial picture, AAUP gathers revenue to do little more than keep itself afloat.
At AAUP, it’s time for the directors and elected leadership to focus less on policy statements, and more on income and expense statements. Until then, and even perhaps after, I think part-timers can count AAUP out of the larger battle to help organize temporary faculty. The organization has a bigger battle ahead of itself to right what has become a seriously listing ship.