How Your Student Evals Are Killing Your Chances for a FT Job (And Better Pay)

Lesko_headshot_outsideby P.D. Lesko

What are the most credible methods and evaluative tools to use when deciding whether to rehire an adjunct faculty member? This is a question that should be asked by hundreds of thousands of college administrators nationwide. Instead, what we get are lazy administrators content to have adjunct faculty evaluations done by the least credible method by the least reliable evaluators: student evaluations. It’s high time, someone smacked college administrators upside their leather office chairs and pointed out that academic research has repeatedly concluded that student evals are terribly biased against women and faculty in various academic disciplines.

A recently released study titled “Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: a large-scale study of data,” once again concludes that there are significant problems with various biases in student evals.: “On average, professors in science and engineering disciplines have lower ratings than in the humanities and arts. When looking at RateMyProfessors as a whole, the effect of a professor’s gender on rating criteria is small but statistically significant. When analysing the data as a function of discipline, however, the effects of gender are significantly more pronounced.”

A 2014 study revealed that female students rated perceived female instructors lower on helpfulness, promptness, consistency, responsiveness, knowledge and clarity. Lillian MacNell, the author of that paper concerning the U.S. data (“What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching“), said she’d seen the latest study and agreed that student evaluations of teaching “generally do not accurately measure teaching effectiveness.”

At this point, any administrator in any two- or four-year college or university in the country who relies either in whole or in large part on student evaluations to make decisions about the quality of any faculty member’s teaching, is incompetent. The excuse from administrators is frequently that there are too many adjunct faculty employed in the department/college/campus or university to use any method other than student evals to evaluate the adjuncts’ teaching. Really? I find that difficult to believe, because there is almost an equal number of administrators/professional support staff and non-tenured faculty currently employed in the U.S.

Between 1995 and 2011, the faculty in four-year colleges and universities grew by nearly 470,000, or 72.4 percent, while non-teaching professionals grew by nearly 400,000, or 75.2 percent. But of the faculty positions added, nine of every ten were non-tenure-track and nearly six of every ten were part-time; of the non-teaching professional positions, more than nine of every ten added was full-time. According to Fall 2011 data from the National Center for Education Statistics, there are just over one million college administrators and professional support staff employed in U.S. colleges and universities. That’s right: one million college administrators were pushing paper around in colleges all over the country in 2011, the latest data available.

Department of Education data collected for fall 2014, document a faculty workforce of 1,569,207 in two- and four-year Title IV–participating United States colleges and universities. Of the 1.57 million college faculty, 52.9 percent had part-time and 19.4 percent full-time temporary appointments with no eligibility for tenure, approximately 1.1 million faculty members.

The majority of adjunct and non-tenured faculty are women. So not only are women getting the long end of the non-tenured appointment stick, they are being forced to undergo evaluations that produce demonstrably biased results. Then, department chairs, deans and other administrators use the results of those biased evaluations to decide whether adjunct faculty should be retained, paid more and/or promoted. Adjunct faculty looking for tenure-line jobs, then, are really getting shafted. Hiring committees often request “evidence of teaching effectiveness” in the form of—yep, you guessed it—student evaluations. One tenure-line job posting I saw recently asked for eight years worth of student evaluations. According to these studies, in certain academic disciplines women are consistently rated lower by student evaluators than their male counterparts for no reason other than the faculty members’ gender.

The other question I have is about the education unions whose affiliate and local contracts require faculty members to be evaluated by students and those student evaluations used in hiring, pay and promotion decisions. Why on earth would a faculty union continue to allow student evaluations to be used at all in such critical career decisions made by administrators? Aren’t unions supposed to bargain contracts in the best interests of members?

Authors of the most recently released study on the reliability of student evals. pointed out that, “Our analysis would support an argument that the use of SET (student evaluations of teaching) has adverse impact on female instructors, at least in the two settings we examined. Eventually, lawsuits will lead universities to do the right thing, if only to mitigate financial risks.”

It’s only a matter of time before the first adjunct faculty member sues over the use of student evaluations in hiring, pay and promotion decisions made by some lazy, chuckleheaded administrator. Then and only then, I believe, will we see hundreds of thousands of administrators get their heads out of their private offices and quickly devise fair, credible, competent and fair evaluative tools and methods for the 1.1 million adjunct faculty teaching the majority of this country’s 21 million undergraduate students.

Short URL:

Leave a Reply

Keep in Touch With AdjunctNation

Graphic Graphic Graphic


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.



Want to see your advertisement on Click here.

From the Archive

  • Campus Equity Week Coverage Round-Up

    Campus Equity Week ran from October 28, 2013-November 2, 2013. The goal of CEW is to draw attention to the working conditions of the nation’s non-tenured faculty. Campus Equity Week was started by the Coalition of Contingent Academic Labor, a grassroots coalition of activists in North America working for contingent faculty: adjunct, part-time, non-tenured, and graduate teaching faculty. […]

  • P/T & F/T Faculty Teamwork

    by Jack Longmate AS PART-TIME FACULTY members step up their organizing efforts throughout California, many are faced with the task of working effectively with already-established full-time chapters. Occasionally, there is friction on some campuses between full- and part-time faculty. The diverse and separate needs of full-time, and part-time faculty often forces them to form separate […]

  • Science: The Journal of the AAAS

    by Chris Cumo SCIENCE, THE JOURNAL of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, is arguably the most influential periodical of its kind. Its 160,000 subscribers make it the largest peer-reviewed scientific journal. The AAAS publishes Science weekly, giving it a currency few journals in any discipline can match. Article topics range from recombinant DNA to […]

  • Adjunct Sues Union and School Over Allegedly Unlawful Dismissal

    By Meredith Dobes Former Roosevelt University professor Robert Klein Engler and his attorney DougIbendahl are moving forward with a complaint against the University and the Roosevelt Adjunct Faculty Organization filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois. After a student in Engler’s Spring 2010 City and Citizenship course filed a harassment complaint against him for telling, what she said […]

  • Active Learning vs. Lecturing in the College Classroom

    by Paul T. Corrigan One often hears of active learning as a new approach. In contrast, lecturing is the traditional method. Those who support active learning consider it an innovation. Those who do not consider it “another in a long line of educational fads,” as Michael Prince notes. The sequence and chronology remain undisputed either way. Lecturing came first. It has […]


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.

Recently Commented

  • AdjunctNation Editorial Team: @Jeffr thanks for pointing out the distinction.
  • Jeffr: Note that adjunct faculty are considered to be on a “term” basis and receives no protection except...
  • Scott: I believe Sami is correct in that this no reasonable assurance language will allow adjuncts continuing access...
  • Nancy West-Diangelo: It’s as if we’ve lost the ability to listen critically. If the point of the work we...
  • Freddi-Jo Bruschke: An excellent description of this editorial.