How Your Student Evals Are Killing Your Chances for a FT Job (And Better Pay)

Lesko_headshot_outsideby P.D. Lesko

What are the most credible methods and evaluative tools to use when deciding whether to rehire an adjunct faculty member? This is a question that should be asked by hundreds of thousands of college administrators nationwide. Instead, what we get are lazy administrators content to have adjunct faculty evaluations done by the least credible method by the least reliable evaluators: student evaluations. It’s high time, someone smacked college administrators upside their leather office chairs and pointed out that academic research has repeatedly concluded that student evals are terribly biased against women and faculty in various academic disciplines.

A recently released study titled “Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: a large-scale study of data,” once again concludes that there are significant problems with various biases in student evals.: “On average, professors in science and engineering disciplines have lower ratings than in the humanities and arts. When looking at RateMyProfessors as a whole, the effect of a professor’s gender on rating criteria is small but statistically significant. When analysing the data as a function of discipline, however, the effects of gender are significantly more pronounced.”

A 2014 study revealed that female students rated perceived female instructors lower on helpfulness, promptness, consistency, responsiveness, knowledge and clarity. Lillian MacNell, the author of that paper concerning the U.S. data (“What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching“), said she’d seen the latest study and agreed that student evaluations of teaching “generally do not accurately measure teaching effectiveness.”

At this point, any administrator in any two- or four-year college or university in the country who relies either in whole or in large part on student evaluations to make decisions about the quality of any faculty member’s teaching, is incompetent. The excuse from administrators is frequently that there are too many adjunct faculty employed in the department/college/campus or university to use any method other than student evals to evaluate the adjuncts’ teaching. Really? I find that difficult to believe, because there is almost an equal number of administrators/professional support staff and non-tenured faculty currently employed in the U.S.

Between 1995 and 2011, the faculty in four-year colleges and universities grew by nearly 470,000, or 72.4 percent, while non-teaching professionals grew by nearly 400,000, or 75.2 percent. But of the faculty positions added, nine of every ten were non-tenure-track and nearly six of every ten were part-time; of the non-teaching professional positions, more than nine of every ten added was full-time. According to Fall 2011 data from the National Center for Education Statistics, there are just over one million college administrators and professional support staff employed in U.S. colleges and universities. That’s right: one million college administrators were pushing paper around in colleges all over the country in 2011, the latest data available.

Department of Education data collected for fall 2014, document a faculty workforce of 1,569,207 in two- and four-year Title IV–participating United States colleges and universities. Of the 1.57 million college faculty, 52.9 percent had part-time and 19.4 percent full-time temporary appointments with no eligibility for tenure, approximately 1.1 million faculty members.

The majority of adjunct and non-tenured faculty are women. So not only are women getting the long end of the non-tenured appointment stick, they are being forced to undergo evaluations that produce demonstrably biased results. Then, department chairs, deans and other administrators use the results of those biased evaluations to decide whether adjunct faculty should be retained, paid more and/or promoted. Adjunct faculty looking for tenure-line jobs, then, are really getting shafted. Hiring committees often request “evidence of teaching effectiveness” in the form of—yep, you guessed it—student evaluations. One tenure-line job posting I saw recently asked for eight years worth of student evaluations. According to these studies, in certain academic disciplines women are consistently rated lower by student evaluators than their male counterparts for no reason other than the faculty members’ gender.

The other question I have is about the education unions whose affiliate and local contracts require faculty members to be evaluated by students and those student evaluations used in hiring, pay and promotion decisions. Why on earth would a faculty union continue to allow student evaluations to be used at all in such critical career decisions made by administrators? Aren’t unions supposed to bargain contracts in the best interests of members?

Authors of the most recently released study on the reliability of student evals. pointed out that, “Our analysis would support an argument that the use of SET (student evaluations of teaching) has adverse impact on female instructors, at least in the two settings we examined. Eventually, lawsuits will lead universities to do the right thing, if only to mitigate financial risks.”

It’s only a matter of time before the first adjunct faculty member sues over the use of student evaluations in hiring, pay and promotion decisions made by some lazy, chuckleheaded administrator. Then and only then, I believe, will we see hundreds of thousands of administrators get their heads out of their private offices and quickly devise fair, credible, competent and fair evaluative tools and methods for the 1.1 million adjunct faculty teaching the majority of this country’s 21 million undergraduate students.

Short URL:

Leave a Reply

Keep in Touch With AdjunctNation

Graphic Graphic Graphic


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.



From the Archive

  • Readers Ask. The Adjunct Advisor Answers.

    by the Adjunct Advisor Students Failing to Cite Sources As part of the course requirements for a Ceramics I class, the students had to complete a brief (approx. 500 words) research paper on a historic ceramic time/culture, such as Ancient Greece, Africa, Italian Renaissance, etc. On the first day of class in January they were […]

  • More Mistakes From My First Semester Teaching Online

    by Jonathan Rees My first semester as an online instructor is almost over. Who knows where the time goes? Curating a respectable online survey course experience comes with a lot of responsibility. In my humble opinion, too many online U.S. history survey courses cling to the vestiges of the traditional lecture model. As I’ve explained here […]

  • #Teaching: Survey Finds Profs Use of Social Media Increasing

    College faculty have evolved their use of social media for professional, personal and instructional use, with a decrease in concerns around the value and amount of time spent using social media, according to a new report from the Babson Survey Research Group. The annual survey of nearly 4,000 teaching faculty from all disciplines in higher education, […]

  • On-Line Science Labs

    by Evelyn Beck IN VIRTUAL SCIENCE labs, students can handle dangerous poisons, analyze raging rivers, and conduct experiments in evolution-activities otherwise impossible for most college students. “The on-line labs were designed to provide a laboratory experience in situations where it is not feasible to do a wet lab because of the time, expense, or danger […]

  • Getting to Know ED

    by Mark Drozdowski IT’S OFFICIALLY KNOWN as the U.S. Department of Education, but it prefersthe simple moniker “Ed.” Recently I visited Ed’s on-line pad,>, to see what he has to offer. After all, I pay Ed’s salary. Those unfamiliar with Ed might think he’s a bit stuffy, but he’s actually rather approachable. To be sure, Ed sometimes […]


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.

Recently Commented

  • Nancy West-Diangelo: It’s as if we’ve lost the ability to listen critically. If the point of the work we...
  • Freddi-Jo Bruschke: An excellent description of this editorial.
  • Julia Holcomb: Tolerance certainly doesn’t mean you get to say things you cannot prove, about things that ought...
  • Michele Spino Martindill: White supremacy has had hundreds of years to dominate campus environments and doesn’t...
  • Anthony Fields: Critique is one thing: preventing someone from even speaking is another. There has been a definite...