Breaking Into Textbook Publishing: The Field is More Level Than You Think
by Brian Cole
Academic publishing. One might think the entire system has broken down. The Internet is filled with articles and Weblogs (blogs) that bemoan the fact that quality scholarship often goes unpublished. With 44,000-plus newly-minted Ph.D.s each year, many of whom invade campuses to try to climb the tenure ladder, the competition to have one’s work published is fierce. So where do part-timers fit in? Is it even more difficult for those who hold part-time faculty appointments to find publishers for their scholarship and research?
According to Cathy N. Davidson, vice provost for interdisciplinary studies, co-founder of the John Hope Franklin Humanities Institute, and a professor of English at Duke University, in her article “Understanding the Economic Burden of Scholarly Publishing” printed in the October 3, 2003 issue of The Chronicle Review, the crisis in scholarly publishing is real, “and it signals a major threat to scholarly communication as we know it.” The focus of her essay revolves around the financial decline of the university press, the center of academic publishing. In the essay, she identifies several theories. They include the aforementioned tie between book publishing and tenure, the rise of chain bookstores and electronic booksellers, and the jargon of post-modern critical theory shrinking the audience for the humanities, among many others.
“The most basic aspect of scholarship–the foundation of our profession–is at risk under the current model of who pays to publish the books and articles we write,” Davidson writes.
According to Dr. Timothy Burke, an associate professor of History at Swarthmore College, and frequent poster to the now-defunct Weblog Invisible Adjunct (http://www.invisibleadjunct.com), disciplines have come to rely on books as an “absolutely [quantitative] marker of merit,” and it keeps administrators from “having to judge the relative merits of intellectual work according to some sort of transportable standard.”
“The crisis in scholarly production is not about books: it’s about the fact that in some disciplines, the book is the fetish-object that shapes one’s chances for hiring, tenure and promotion. It’s those systems that need forcible intervention in this regard.”
Within this system, Burke says part-timers face unique challenges in getting their books published. He synthesizes those challenges thusly:
- 1. How to do it when you don’t have the support systems that tenure-track faculty have (salary, time, access to resources, sabbaticals).
- 2. The problem of gate-keeping in peer review.
- 3. The expense and difficulty of “shopping” your work at conferences and so on (e.g., that it is important to give papers that showcase some aspect of your publication in order to get it academic credibility).