Adjunct Faculty Fulbright Winners

  by Diane Calabrese MORE THAN three dozen adjunct faculty members were among the 2000-2001 winners of 745 Fulbright teaching and research awards. (See TAA, March/April 2001 - you will need to sign in.) A few of the winners were kind enough to take time to talk with TAA. They told us something about why they applied, and what the experience afforded by Fulbright will mean for their personal and professional development. They also shared a few words about their reactions to learning they had received the award. And they offered some advice to others who are applying for Fulbright awards. The award winners who commented for the article are: • Robert Stephen Bickerstaff, visiting professor, School of Law, University of Texas, Austin, host country Germany, scholarship category law, for lecturing and research in telecommunications regulation and policy (the effects of differing regulatory structures on the development and use of certain technologies). • Julio C. Cruz, adjunct professor, School of Allied Medical Professions, Ohio State University, Columbus, host country Peru, scholarship category medical sciences, for lecturing and research in respiratory physiology, and standards of lung-function testing in the city of Piura. • Joan Loretta Fabian, an image resource technician and adjunct instructor, Alamo Community College District, San Antonio College, Texas, host country Pakistan, scholarship category art, for lecturing in art. • William Earle Hughes, adjunct professor, Department of Political Science, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, host country Tunisia, scholarship category law, for lecturing in American law and society, constitutional law, and legal history; and conducting a faculty reading group on the American novel. • Amy Kirle Lezberg, visiting fellow, New England Resource Center for Higher Education, University of Massachusetts, Boston, host country Qatar, scholarship category education, for research in learner-centered quality control (implementing accreditation in Palestinian institutions of higher education). • Moorad Mooradian, an affiliate of the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution (ICAR), George Mason University, Fairfax Station, Virginia, host country Armenia, scholarship category area studies, for lecturing on war, violence, and conflict resolution (and how these apply to the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict). • Hou-mei Sung, adjunct professor in the Department of Art, Cleveland State University, Ohio, host country Taiwan, scholarship category art history, for research in the political messages of Chinese horse painting in the Ming Court. • Susan Lynn Zickmund, visiting professor in the program in biomedical ethics and medical humanities, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, host country Germany, scholarship category communications and journalism, for lecturing on sickness and signifiers (the cultural representations of American policy from medicine to the body politic). [Note: Zickmund had to decline her award for personal reasons, but will apply again.]
Why They Applied
The public image of a scholar sometimes stops short at a stereotypical image of a dreamer. But like any person committed to his work, the scholar is an equal mix of pragmatist and idealist. So committed is she to her studies of Chinese painting in the Ming regional schools and especially court painters, Hou-mei Sung says, "I don't mind investing my time [and personal] money" to keep the research going. But traveling back and forth to Taiwan, where she finds precisely the rare books and manuscripts she needs to inform her scholarly efforts, is an expensive proposition. Sung applied to the Fulbright program primarily to get help with the funds necessary for her research. She has published more than thirty scholarly papers, and she has completed a book-length manuscript she would like to see in print. But a great obstacle to finding a niche for the book is the cost of producing a volume with so many reproductions of artworks. There are many expenditures that surface in the fees ancillary to the text, such as the transport, permissions, and photography of paintings. Undaunted, Sung continues to contact presses and granting agencies that might subsidize her book. Indirectly, the Fulbright frees up some time for Sung to fledge the book because she has a period of sustained financial support for her basic research. William Earle Hughes is on a more secure footing with respect to an income stream than many adjunct faculty winners are. "I'm unusual in that I'm a practicing lawyer," he says, "[and] teaching on the side." With an interest in the philosophy of law, Hughes has been anchored in both philosophy and political science departments as an adjunct, most recently at the University of Tulsa. In his law practice, he functions chiefly as a litigator and thus spends considerable time in court. "I applied [for a Fulbright] because I thought it would be a good experience [and] a good opportunity to improve my French and Arabic," says Hughes. When Hughes was invited by the University of Tunis to teach a course in the philosophy of law, he saw it as a wonderful prospect, even though he would be developing the course for the first time. It's often a request from a host country that spurs a scholar to pick up a Fulbright application. Steve (Robert Stephen) Bickerstaff says, "I had been asked by the University of Göttingen, Germany, to teach a course on telecommunications and Internet regulation. A good friend with experience with Fulbright suggested that I apply." But each applicant's story has a unique twist. Indeed, Amy Kirle Lezberg says, "I applied . . . after I took early retirement from the New England Association of Schools and Colleges." Even with her track record as associate director of the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education, Lezberg determined she would benefit from the "psychological support," as well as the defined funding, "to provide entry to the ministries and universities abroad" that were trying to "institute quality-control accreditation mechanisms." And Julio C. Cruz, a medical doctor, says he applied in large part because he needed financial support for his project. The theme of securing money to pursue a line of inquiry or a joint project is a common one. Yet in one way or another, each adjunct faculty member was motivated to apply by the promise for growth inherent in the Fulbright award. That includes self-development in ways that enable a recipient to expand the scope of his or her work to dimensions that can edify society. Language immersion, access to primary sources, and a chance to make a novel contribution to pedagogy all ranked high among reasons for applying. There was also the less quantifiable but just as palpable desire to be stimulated and invigorated by being a long-term resident a different environment. "I always wanted to get a Fulbright and teach in another country," says Joan Loretta Fabian, who taught art in Pakistan. "The idea of being immersed in a foreign land has been a dream for me. Since I am a visual artist, it is important that I be stimulated visually and intellectually as well. Travel does something for me and my work changes because of it as I do . . . We grow, develop, and then, blossom . . . ."
What They Gained
For Fabian, the Fulbright experience has allowed her "to examine" her "own 'Western' theories as to what is beautiful in art," she says. "This is very refreshing to me." The personal and professional expansion Fulbright nourishes just begins during the tenure of the award, according to Fabian and others. "I have developed many friendships from this opportunity," says Fabian. "And new ideas for exchanges are constantly coming up that have started by my trip to Pakistan." To be sure, Mooran Mooradian has seen his Fulbright effort spark many related endeavors. At the Yerevan State University, Mooradian has worked to help develop a graduate program in conflict analysis and resolution. The program has generated "more [interest] than we can handle," he says. Students are so committed to it they have named the course of study with the shorthand moniker "conflictology." Not only has Mooradian mentored lecturers at the Armenian university; he has also encouraged other faculty to apply to Fulbright awards. He has also been involved in building the library at the university by carrying contributions of books from the United States. But Mooradian emphasizes that whatever he has given to others during his Fulbright experience has been equaled or surpassed by what he has acquired from it personally and professionally. He points to the antiquity of Armenia and stresses what "a thriving culture" it encompasses. He also indicates the satisfaction he feels at seeing the movement of scholars and students between the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution (ICAR) at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, and Yerevan State University. The superb students in his classes at Yerevan were a particular source of inspiration to Mooradian. "When I first went [to the university], I was teaching in Armenian," says Mooradian. "[But] the majority [of students] speak, read, write English quite well." Flawless British English is the norm, says Mooradian, and he notes that facility with languages is just the beginning of the excellent preparation of the students consistently exhibit. The reciprocity that Fulbright awards engender routinely spans nations. That is well illustrated by the experience of Steve Bickerstaff. "I was able to teach at Göttingen and also to lecture by invitation at universities in Augsburg, Vienna, Köln, Frankfurt, Jena, St. Gallen, and Oxford," he explains. "Relationships established . . . led to further teaching opportunities at St. Gallen and to a joint St. Gallen [and] University of Texas symposium in November 2001." The symposium at the Austin university will bring together students and faculty from Germany, Switzerland, and the United States. It is just the sort of connection to which a Fulbright often leads. William Earle Hughes lived in Morocco for two years when he was in high school, and he valued the immersion in Arabic enough to continue his formal study of the language. He recalls with great relish the test of his French and Arabic his teaching stint in Tunisia provided. "It was a good opportunity to improve my French and Arabic," says Hughes, explaining the university is Francophone, but the community is more diverse. "I taught half of my courses in French and half in English. Once you get outside Tunis [everyone speaks] Arabic." The Fulbright has a certain "prestige" built into it, says Julio Cruz. And for Cruz, the status of the award makes it easier to establish ties in Peru as he conducts research that will contribute to better assessment of lung function. Like Cruz, Amy Kirle Lezberg found there is good deal of esteem associated with the award. "The Fulbright assisted me in providing [professional entry]," she says. "And personally I got to live for an extended time in the Middle East, which I could not otherwise have afforded. In carrying it out, I have also found time to continue my writing and publications free of routine." A release of hours for scholarship is a benefit many Fulbright awardees cite. Hou-mei Sung says the funding most definitely enabled her to have an extended period of research without the responsibility of teaching. She hopes it will also confer recognition on her work, the sort of visibility that might help secure a permanent job. William Earle Hughes also sees the possibility of the Fulbright bringing new teaching possibilities. Besides garnering recognition for a recipient's work, the Fulbright typically expands a recipient's repertoire of course development. For example, in Tunisia, Hughes developed a course on America's literary historians, such as Francis Parkman and Henry Adams. In the cross-disciplinary-conscious world of higher education, such an approach is likely to get attention. Amy Kirle Lezberg says she expects her Fulbright to open many doors. "The Fulbright will enhance my scholarship by providing entry to the offices of ministers of education [and so on]." The award will also allow her "to set up meetings and workshops without having to ask for additional financial support."
What It Means to Get the News
Sometimes getting the news of a Fulbright award can be bittersweet. Susan Lynn Zickmund had to decline the award because of health reasons. She plans to apply again and regrets she will not immediately be able to implement the "curriculum revolving around health communications" that she developed. Zickmund's experience is not unique, and she may find solace in Joan Loretta Fabian's story. "I was very happy and excited," says Fabian about her reaction to learning she won support in the 2000-2001 cycle. "I first received this award in 1999, but I was undergoing cancer treatment and had to decline. That was the hardest thing to do. "But they said my proposal was a very strong one and recommended that I reapply the following year if my health permitted. They don't defer awards. So I did and the rest is history. I was so glad they awarded it to me again and even happier the second time." Besides the complexity of coordinating travel for Fulbright with the course of one's personal life, there are other sorts of unexpected turns that must be negotiated. Finessing must often be done and on short notice. "My reaction to receiving the Fulbright was one of happiness," says Amy Kirle Lezberg. "Also, since I was first awarded a Fulbright to the Palestinian territories, I was a bit concerned what would happen if the Intifada grew. It did, and I was evacuated from Jerusalem and invited by the University of Qatar to continue there." Lezberg's experience exemplifies the way in which a Fulbright often begets other chances for learning and collaboration. She explains, "Many of the institutions [in the State of Qatar] are glad to welcome" her as a Fulbright scholar and that many of their faculty "require no more information than that in offering me their assistance." The reach of Fulbright extends well beyond institutions of higher learning, so the award has a way of bringing additional recognition. "Being a Fulbright automatically has included me in certain activities run by the [U.S.] Embassy," said Lezberg, "[such as] choosing overseas scholars to come to the United States, presenting information to the Ministry employees, [and] attending visiting presentations." Ultimately, the Fulbright led to Lezberg "being asked to remain an extra term" as a visiting professor at the University of Qatar. The reaction Hou-mei Sung had to receiving her award, echoes what many others told TAA. "I was very happy and surprised," she says, "because I know it's very competitive." Sung adds, "In the past, 1 have applied numerous times." She says if she were to give one piece of advice to prospective applicants it would be to "just keep trying."
Words of Advice
Persistence is a key to success, to be sure. However, there is abundant help to be had from the Fulbright Program itself. The program wins high praise for being inclusive-not caring whether an applicant holds a full-time faculty position or not-as well as for its staffs' commitment to guiding applicants through the process. Easy-to-access information is in place at the Web site of the Council for International Exchange of Scholars (CIES), the entity that assists the U.S. Department of State with administration of the Fulbright program. The Web address for Fulbright resources at the CIES is www.cies.org. A list of the ten myths about the Fulbright Scholar awards posted at the site should provide encouragement to all potential applicants. The 2000-2001 recipients who commented for this article also do a very good job of dispelling many myths. "I found the [staff] in Washington who check the applications and process them . . . very helpful," says William Earle Hughes. "[They were] very good about sending me materials," particularly forwarding information that was arriving from Tunisia. Hughes advises that applicants "make early contact" with the office in the nation's capital. Making use of the office to the fullest extent is something he recommends. Once an award is made, the same high level of support continues. Mooran Mooradian says, "The people who run my program are very, very helpful. [It is] just an outstanding program. They never failed to respond to me. They're inculcated into the system . . . [to] help you do your job." As for the importance of language fluency, it is important, but it is not required. "I speak, read, and write the language," says Mooradian. "It's a tremendous help [to be fluent in Armenian]." Nevertheless, the level of English fluency at Yerevan State University meant a non-Armenian speaker could be successful, especially since Fulbright provides interpreters, and translators are readily available. But Mooradian says, "It's a better rapport" when the Fulbright instructor is fluent in the language or languages of the host country. Even so, he says, "language is not prohibitive" in any way, and those without fluency in the language of the host country should still apply. William Earle Hughes spent time in Paris before submitting his Fulbright proposal because he wanted to be immersed in French to improve his skills. "I actually think it would take a couple of years of preparation [for people without fluency]," says Hughes, "but having foreign language capabilities would enhance chances of getting a grant." The two things that fluency in more than a single language demonstrates are industry and flexibility. Fulbright likes to see both of those characteristics, according to some applicants. "Show what multicultural challenges you have faced and brag about them in the proposal," says Joan Loretta Fabian. "Let them know you are up to the challenge of living and teaching in a foreign country . . . Don't worry if your home institution is not Yale or Harvard." And to insert a bit of Fulbright myth-breaking information here, one does not have to be affiliated with a college or university in order to receive a Fulbright. The program reaches out to artists and professionals, including lawyers, filmmakers, musicians, and journalists. The broad umbrella of Fulbright is described by the advice of Amy Kirle Lezberg. She says, "The committees seemed much more interested in my proposal than in my employment status." Experience in the proposed host country can help, especially in terms of securing a specific invitation. Susan Zickmund had abundant experience in Germany. And she won an award with her first application. Zickmund advises that thoroughness counts, too. "There are a lot of pieces of paper," she says, recommending that applicants take the time to read the instructions carefully and follow them precisely. "Give them exactly what they want," she says about addressing an application to the Fulbright evaluators. She cites the great detail provided in the Online Awards Catalog, which is available on-line at the CIES Web site in .pdf format. Finally, adjunct faculty members might make the case that they are a perfect fit for the program. Steve Bickerstaff said, "If an adjunct has time and independent resources, the Fulbright organization can afford tremendous opportunities abroad. It provides helpful assistance and support for someone who is at a point in their lives where they want to learn more about other countries and to contribute to the sharing of information across national borders. Adjuncts are often practitioners rather than academics. This combination of scholarship and practical experience can be valuable to students and to faculty in another country." Social cohesion gets taken for granted when it thrives. When it is absent, it gets noticed. At the core of the Fulbright Program stands the simple idea that the more people interact with one another, the greater mutual understanding they will achieve, and the stronger the alliances that will be across cultures and nations. [/private]