Part-Time Thoughts

  • 19 Dec 2008 /  administrators, part-time faculty

    At the University of South Carolina, president Harris Pastides has a $39 million dollar budget deficit. That sounds horrifying to those of us with $39 dollars in our savings accounts. However, It’s exactly 4.5 percent of the $866 million dollar 2008-2009 budget for Pastides’s university system. It’s more dramatic to say $39 million dollars, though, right? Try the 4.5 percent line on a friend: “Joe, my God, I’m grappling with a 4.5 percent budget deficit.” See if you get tea and sympathy, or if you get a smart smack on the side of your head. If Pastides had gone in front of the media and bitched that he was grappling mightily with a (groan) 4.5 percent deficit, someone (say, maybe, those in the state legislature who voted to cut $39 million from the state’s allocation to the University system) might have questioned him much more sharply. Now, however, the heat is on the pols who made the cuts. 

    To deal with his money woes, Pastides announced to the good people of South Carolina that he’s cutting 25 percent of the university’s part-time contracts. So, next Spring, 100 adjuncts won’t be rehired. “Good Gracious Almighty” (I can hear people muttering now), “times are tough when 25 percent of the faculty go!” It’s just that, well, the University of South Carolina employs close to 1,500 temporary faculty. So when Pastides says he’s cutting, gulp, 25 percent, he’s kind of playing with numbers. 

    Don’t think those 100 adjunct faculty will add up to $39 million dollars. Not by a loooooong shot. Pastides has trimmed 30 tenured faculty through retirements and buy-outs, and axed just under 200 staff. In a sign of just how dire the situation is, Pastides has said he may have to close one of the USC’s 8 campuses and may have to close some degree programs. 

    Tags: , , ,

  • 17 Dec 2008 /  part-time faculty

    According to this piece from the Palm Beach Post web site, the for profit South University president John Peterson, disinvited all of the school’s adjunct faculty from the annual holiday bash at the Breakers. Ok, those of us chilling in northern climes may have a tough time feeling sorry for our Palm Beach colleagues, but a social diss is a social diss. 

    Actually, Ebenezer Peterson explained that while it pained him to invite only the full-time faculty to the school’s holiday party (because they’re all a bunch of bronzed and boring sods?), he’d been instructed to reduce the school’s travel and entertainment budget (no more junkets to Key West?). The school’s Director of Communications, Heather Askew, put it this way: “While adjunct faculty are an important part of our university, they are not part of our full time faculty.”

    Well, Merry Christmas to you, too, Jacob Marley.

    So, who’s showing up at the South University party at the Breakers? A quick trip to the South University web page showed that the college has, well, just about as many full-time faculty teaching on the Palm Beach campus as you’d expect, around 60. Let’s just say no one should make more than 3 trays of hors d’oeuvres now that the part-timers aren’t attending the bash. 

    South University is owned and operated by Education Management Corporation (www.edmc.com). The company operates 83 campuses in 26 states and enrolls some 96,000 students. Education Management Corporation is among the largest providers of private post-secondary education in North America. Last year the company raked in $1.09 billion in revenue. As of 2007, EMC employed 13,000 full-time, part-time and adjunct faculty. Shall we take bets on the breakdown of full-time to part-time faculty? 

     

     

    Tags: , ,

  • According to a piece published in Haaretz today, the 5,000 adjunct faculty who teach at Israeli universities have won a major battle in their fight for better pay, seniority and job security. Until now, the adjuncts were employed as contract workers and dismissed at the end of each academic year. They had no job security, and qualified for few social benefits (such as health care and retirement).

    Adjuncts in Israel have been fighting for the past several years to have their professional contributions recognized, their qualifications acknowledged (most hold Ph.D.s), and their employment regularized by the universities that employ them. For an adjunct to be eligible to be covered under the auspices of the new contract, s/he will have to prove that s/he has no outside employment that pays in excess of $3,800 per month.

     

    Tags: , , ,

  • 09 Dec 2008 /  AAUP, contracts, part-time faculty, unions

    Friends, folks, fellow education workers, Romans, countryman, there’s Trouble in Idaho. I say there’s Trouble. That’s Trouble with a capital T, and that rhymes with D and that stands for “Due process” (my sincere apologies to “Music Man” lovers out there, but I just couldn’t resist). Alright, let’s start at the very beginning: it seems that an adjunct at Northern Idaho College got the sack. She’d taught for more than six years, was nominated for the Part-time Faculty of the Year Award, and one day opened an email from her boss that said she wasn’t getting any more classes. Why? Well, I think you know the answer to that question. Who the hell knows why! She had a “Special Appointment” one-semester-only contract, and it ended. No one at the college would explain what had happened, and when Jessica Bryan, an English instructor, filed a grievance, the administration claimed that, under the auspices of her contract, she had no right to a “review.”

    If this all sounds familiar, pardon me for repeating the kind of story you may have read, heard or experienced yourself. I know someone to whom this has happened not once, but twice. She helped organize unions at her colleges then, later, at each college, her lectureships dried up. I was scandalized and outraged on her behalf. When this happens to people, it’s heartbreaking, because like my friend, I am sure Jessica Bryan was a superb instructor, devoted to her students, her career and her department. Well, either that, or Jessica Bryan was one of those part-timers netted, mounted and catalogued recently by Paul Umbach—you know the ones—the part-timers who aren’t committed to their students…the one’s who are adversely impacting student retention. 

    So, the AAUP sent in the Marines. Well, it was more like a couple staff members dressed in those sweaters with the leather elbows, packing hefty briefcases, with the full weight and support of the AAUP leadership, Dr. Cary Nelson. According to a press release sent by the AAUP to media outlets yesterday: “Efforts by the AAUP staff to persuade the administration to recognize Bryan’s rights under the Association’s recommended standards proved unavailing.” No doubt AAUP officials used the Think Method, because the Good Lord knows AAUP officials haven’t actually organized part-time faculty into affiliated locals in any great numbers within recent memory, and nothing short of, say, sanction (with teeth) was going to get those administrators to capitulate. 

    Listen, don’t get me wrong. It was swell of AAUP officials to try and help Jessica Bryan. However, like Pierre Schmitz, of whom I blogged about recently, Jessica Bryan accepted a contract that restricted her rights to due process, and a contract that lasted, well, one semester. Unlike Pierre Schmitz, Jessica Bryan isn’t going to have to apply for food stamps, lose her health insurance, or move to another city to support herself. Her husband is a tenured faculty member at Northern Idaho College, and he earns, according to the college’s faculty salary schedule, anywhere from $54,000-$66,000 (twice the median income for a household in Coeur d’Alene)  per year, plus benefits, including retirement, six kinds of insurance, a month of paid vacation, tuition waivers for his kids at 8 Idaho colleges, professional development funding, childcare, discounted memberships at six gyms and even a discount of almost 20 percent from Verizon wireless. If you ask me, Jessica Bryan, even without her teaching job, is making out like a bandit thanks to to husband’s appointment. 

    So, of the thousands and thousands of part-time faculty in cities all over the United States who were unceremoniously fired without due process in 2008, AAUP president Dr. Cary Nelson, the AAUP Executive Committee and staff chose to come to the rescue of the wife of a tenured faculty member. They chose a woman who, I would venture to guess, earned more than the $335 per semester credit hour than is the going rate for part-time faculty positions at the school, who was hired as a faculty spouse, and whose dismissal was a personal inconvenience, as opposed to a bona fide human tragedy. 

    So, why did AAUP Executive Committee and staff choose Jessica Bryan of Northern Idaho College in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, with its 95 percent white, small-town population of 41,328? Ironically enough, putting median incomes aside, the racial make-up and total population of Coeur d’Alene reflect almost exactly the total membership and racial make-up of the AAUP itself. However, that’s not why Jessica Bryan was chosen. It’s not because she was the only case brought to the attention of AAUP’s elected leaders, and whose unfair treatment union leaders were urged to have AAUP investigate, either. Cary Nelson has, in past, stonewalled attempts by AAUP part-time faculty activists to have the organization investigate the abuse of part-time faculty. So I ask, again, why did AAUP choose Jessica Bryan of Northern Idaho College in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho? Why not Pierre Schmitz at San Antonio College? Why not the part-timers at Champaign-Urbana, or Bunker Hill Community College, in Boston. Hell, why not the American University in Washington, DC, right around the corner from AAUP headquarters? 

    I think AAUP leaders chose  Jessica Bryan of Northern Idaho College in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho for the same reason Professor Harrold Hill choose River City, Iowa. Small towns make excellent locations for Big Production Numbers. Make no mistake friends, folks, fellow education workers, Romans, countryman, AAUP leaders are giving us all a song and a dance. They’re peddling the Think Method in response to the exploitation of thousands and thousands of part-time faculty.

    Think. Men. Think.

    Nope. I still can’t play the clarinet, and AAUP leaders still ain’t stepping up and helping part-time faculty in the United States.  

     

     

     

     

    Tags: , , , ,

  • The AFT recently came out with a new study that concludes part-time faculty are teaching a majority of the courses offered at public colleges and universities in the U.S. I suppose the surprise, then, has to do with the use of part-time faculty at 4-year institutions. We all know that community colleges have been loaded down with part-time faculty for at least two decades. Now the kicker: the AFT’s study is titled “Reversing Course: The Troubled State of Academic Staffing and a Path Forward.”

    Maybe I’m so wrong that when I re-read this a decade hence, I will look back at my own naivete and chuckle. However, AFT higher education leaders (right along with the AAUP’s president Dr. Cary Nelson) are baying at the full moon. Yes, Virginia, adjuncts teach the majority of courses in public colleges in the United States. Yes, my Sweet, temporary faculty now comprise the majority of faculty in the United States. At the moment, 52 percent of college faculty teach part-time and 70 percent of the nation’s 1.2 million college faculty teach off the tenure-track.

    The InsideHigherEd piece I read about the study quotes an AFT usual suspect, Barbara Bowen, president of PSC-CUNY. IHE founder and writer Scott Jaschik needs to consider the sources he uses. Barbara Bowen, and other PSC-CUNY leaders, recently quashed a revolt among its 8,000 part-time members with tactics that included refusing part-time members access to the union’s email list. The part-timers were up in arms over a proposed contract that included the ever-so-popular, yet clearly evil “equal percentage raise.” Oh, and when there was a chance that the AFT’s boondoggle FACE program would be funded by the New York State Assembly (pre-Spitzer’s spin with a call girl), New York State officials who suggested adjunct faculty currently teaching at CUNY be hired for the funded full-time positions, met with “resistance” on the part of PSC-CUNY union officials, as well as the union’s full-time faculty members. 

    Back to the study. So, here’s my observation: the trend of using huge numbers of part-time faculty to teach the majority of courses at public colleges and universities in the United States will never be reversed. First of all, even with the minimal institutional support, non-existent job security and poor supervision they’re afforded part-timers they do just as good a job in the classroom as their full-time colleagues. Second of all, the trillions simply don’t exist in our state and federal budgets to reverse the trend. As a result, every dollar the education unions spend on political influence, programs, staff and studies aimed at reversing the trend are being wasted in the name of chuckle-headed policy and poor leadership.

    Well, FACE and union activists might argue that higher education deserves more funding, and with more funding colleges and universities will, yes, funnel millions into hiring more full-time faculty. Sure they will.  If colleges won’t allocate money now to the hiring of more full-time, tenure-stream faculty, what evidence do we have that just giving them more money will result in a reversal of the current staffing trends? In 2006, states spent a total of $191 billion dollars to enroll a scant 5.9 percent of our country’s adult population. The majority of those people were taught by part-timers and taught very competently, thank you very much.

    With significantly more money at their disposal, there’s scant evidence to lead us to conclude that college administrators would spend it any differently than they do at the moment. This is what makes the notion of “reversing” the staffing trends in higher education wrong-headed. 

    So, where should the AFT, AAUP and NEA be plowing their tens of millions of dollars in higher education money? They ought to plow it into actually organizing temporary faculty. The education unions ought to work to legislate pro-rata pay and benefits for temporary college faculty through a national (ideally) platform. Union leaders should start tomorrow making sure that their locals leaders stop screwing their part-time faculty members by negotiating “equal percentage” raises, and by classifying full-time faculty who teach overload as part-time faculty.

    When, oh, when will the AAUP, AFT and NEA make the institutional support of part-time faculty a national priority? I predict it will happen sometime in the next decade after FACE falls flat on its rear-end.

    Tags: , , , ,

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes