Listen to my blog entry here.
I have been reading, with interest, the whoop-la over at the AFT about its FACE initiative. Craig Smith has given over his FACE-talk blog to part-time faculty in states where FACE legislation is being introduced. Lila Harper, a Vice President of the Washington Federation of Teachers left her opinions concerning FACE, then Jennie Smith, a Pennsylvania AFT representative and part-timer, left a somewhat plaintive call for solidarity. There is, it appears, some serious dissent in the ranks concerning FACE, and it seems that AFT officials are trying to stop it.
A couple of weeks ago, I received an email from an Adjunct Advocate reader who alleges that the Washington Federation of Teachers had hired part-time faculty at $30 per hour for its so-called FACE Force. The hiring of the faculty isn't really anything out of the ordinary. Organizations hire consultants all the time to help educate members. It was the second part of the email that caught my eye. The writer said that part-time faculty employed by the WFT's FACE Force had testified in front of the Washington State Legislature in support of the WFT's proposed FACE legislation.
Paying people to testify isn't anything new either. Expert witnesses don't testify at civil and criminal trials out of the goodness of their hearts. They get paid. The catch is this: those taking testimony are told which witnesses are getting paid to testify. I sent an email to Dr. Lynne Dodson, who did the hiring for FACE Force, and asked if any of the part-time faculty who'd testified in front of the state legislators had been paid to do so.
According to Dr. Dodson's biography on her local's website, "....She became SCCFT President for the first time in the fall of 1999, took a year off when she ran (proudly but unsuccessfully, alas) for the state legislature, and was re-elected to the presidency in 2007. She is also a VP in the AFT WA and chairs the AFT WA Community College Council, she's a delegate to the state and county labor councils, and serves on the Executive Board of WA State Jobs with Justice."
I have assigned a reporter to investigate whether part-time faculty in Washington State were paid by the WFT/AFT to testify and, if so, if legislators were made aware. I'm also curious about where the money to pay the part-timers came from, and how much was spent. As I said, paying part-time faculty to share their opinions in support of FACE is nothing out of the ordinary. Not making it clear to those taking the testimony that the witnesses were paid is somewhat more unorthodox. More on this later, as the story develops (or not).
Posted By Patricia L. at 8:43 PM
By: P.D. Lesko
Posted: March 19th 2008 8:29 am
Hi Terry! Thanks for your comment. To play devil's advocate for a moment, Sandra Schroeder has pointed out, repeatedly, that per course wages for part-time faculty have risen to 60 percent of what a full-time faculty member earns per course. Of course, it doesn't help when unions negotiate equal percentage raises for both full-time and part-time faculty, but 20 percent more money is 20 percent more money, right?
By: Terry Knudsen
Posted: March 18th 2008 11:13 pm
Sandra and Lynn, neither one of whom is "part-time" have been "representing" part-time faculty, and their lack of effectiveness is clear when we realize that in Washington State, most of the community college instructors are still treated like dirt and paid like serfs. Sandra and Lynn should just step down. They have failed to treat all faculty equally.
Part-Time Thoughts
The Administrator-Adjunct Experience (gag me with a briefcase)
Lesko Blog
The Candidate
• Someone Sends a Message in a Bottle...
• The Lesko Blog Popularity Contest (Is It Cheating If I Win?)
• Some Confusion Over What Journalists Do
• CCCCs in San Francisco (2009)
• The Pamphlet Police at Wayne State University
• Academe's Titan Steaming Toward the Iceberg
• Report from AACC: Adjuncts are in, Sweetie
• Can P/T Faculty at Wayne State University Win Job Security?
Feel like relaxing? Why not play a little Hang-Prof?