Manage my account

 

PART-TIME THOUGHTS


June 16th 2008

I Strongly Object

I recently read a piece about New Jersey Governor Corzine's pension reform plan. The long and short of it is that the Governor's proposal would exclude anyone working fewer than 30 hours per week from the state's pension system. That would include, according to the article, 10,000 part-time faculty.

In response to the possibility that 10,000 part-time faculty might be excluded from the pension system in New Jersey, "[l]awmakers also are getting objections from the unions that represent more than 10,000 part-time college faculty members. They claim the proposal to exclude anyone working less than 30 hours a week from the pension system will eliminate the retirement benefit for all part-time professors."

Objections? That's it?

At Rutgers, in New Jersey, the AAUP-AFT local represents about 1,000 part-time lecturers (PTLs). Dues are .05 percent of pay, or $20 per term per course. Non-union members pay a fee of 85 percent of dues "to cover the costs of representation." Since 2005, the Rutgers chapter has been affiliated with both AAUP and AFT. Those 1,000 part-timers represent almost one-fourth of the AAUP's total part-time faculty membership.

The AAUP recently held its annual meeting. A quick look at the program, leaves one feeling, well, like no one at AAUP's national office is paying attention to the fact that almost one-quarter of the union's entire part-time faculty population is in jeopardy of losing their retirement benefits. At the AAUP's recent annual meeting, there was this special panel of interest: “Stories Your Mother (and the Dean) Never Told You: Planning Now for Future Health Security in Retirement." Here's the panel description:A new paradigm for sustaining retiree medical benefits for retiring faculty and staff at colleges and universities. The presenter will be Linda Cool, Professor of Anthropology at Union College and Founding Director of Emeriti Retirement Health Solutions.There was also a TIAA-CREF seminar. A lovely little get-together for those AAUP members who have access to TIAA-CREF benefits, or who have access to TIAA-CREF benefits until they don't anymore.

Heck, maybe the New Jersey part-timers who attended the AAUP Annual Meeting drank away their sorrows at the AAUP's one hour "Contingent Faculty and Interested Parties Meet for Happy Hour" schmoozapalooza. It was the only event for part-time faculty at the three-day conference.

Finally—I saved the best for last—the theme of the AAUP's 94th Annual Meeting was "Scholars in Peril." It seems AAUP is more concerned with the fact that scholars from abroad are having a more difficult time securing Visas for entry into the United States, than whether or not 25 percent of their total part-time membership will have to start eating wallpaper paste for protein after they lose their retirement benefits.

Then again, AAUP has defied gravity, conventional business practices, and logic for the past decade. In 2007, after Dr. Cary Nelson was elected president, the organization increased dues for those members who earn the least by 380 percent, and dues for those who earn the most were increased by only 3.8 percent. Between 2000 and 2007, membership fell from 45,000 to 41,543, but revenue jumped from $5 million per year to $7.3 million.

"Scholars in Peril," indeed. I strongly object. The hubris and thoughtlessness boggle the mind.

Posted By Part-Time T. at June 16th 2008 1:09 PM

By: Anonymous
Posted: June 22nd 2008 8:12 pm
Thank you for this post. I have been an adjunct professor at two New Jersey state colleges for a number of years. I have also been contributing to the state pension. Now, with this bill, the pension will supposedly be eliminated for adjuncts. What about the money that I have contributed to the state pension system? I have worked very hard over the years and generally teach four or five courses a semester, including summers. This is an insult. I would say that at the colleges I teach adjuncts make up at least 50 percent of the population and many of them have been teaching our students for a long-time. They deserve some respect and rewards for their efforts. Adjuncts earnings are far below the average full-time professor and we do not get any real benefits, outside of being in this pension system. I get no healthcare benefits.


Rss Feed

AdjunctNation E-Newsletters

AdjunctNation Family Newsletter

Want to be notified of Family gatherings, blog, job and magazine updates?

Enter e-mail address



E-Advocate Newsletter

Want to read our weekly e-Newsletter packed with teaching tips, news, and updates about upcoming issues of the Adjunct Advocate magazine?

Current Issue

Enter e-mail address


?>

Book Source

Nation Blogs

Part-Time Thoughts
I Strongly Object

Lesko Blog
The Candidate

 

Blog Archives

•  July 2008

•  June 2008

•  May 2008

•  April 2008

•  March 2008

•  February 2008

•  January 2008

•  December 2007

•  November 2007

Adjunct Poll

Do you enjoy teaching?
 Yes
 No
 I can't decide


results
view past polls

Cartoon Time

Student Cap

Daily Excuse

I think I remember that I forgot something that I really needed to complete that task for you. Sorry!

Add your excuse here

Feel like relaxing? Why not play a little Hang-Prof?