Thousands of International Scholars Call for U.S. Academic Conference Boycott to Protest Muslim Travel Ban

by Ellie Bothwell

More than 4,000 scholars have signed a petition calling for an academic boycott of international conferences held in the U.S., to provide solidarity with those affected by Donald Trump’s ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries.

The petition questions the “intellectual integrity” of international conferences in the country while the ban persists and “the dialogues they are designed to encourage while Muslim colleagues are explicitly excluded from them.”

It includes signatures from academics from across the world, including Europe, Asia, Australia, Canada, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East.

John Richardson, reader in critical discourse studies at Loughborough University, who signed the petition, told Times Higher Education that it is “important to signal publicly that the situation in America following Trump’s election is morally, politically and legally unacceptable.”

He added that his research is on racism and fascism and it would be “indefensible” for him to discuss his research findings “in a context where colleagues who are most directly affected, and can speak from personal experience, are not allowed to be present.”

But some have suggested that the boycott would unfairly harm US universities, while others have claimed that Mr Trump does not care enough about higher education to feel threatened by the ban.

Marina Costin Fuser, Ph.D. candidate in film studies at University of Sussex, said “American universities” should not be “our target.”

“Let’s be supportive of U.S. universities at times like this. Universities have the potential to encourage critical ideas and organize resistance,” she said.

“I don’t think Trump cares that much about higher education to actually feel threatened by this conference ban…unless applied hard scientists join in, we’ll be boycotting ourselves – that is, departments that lean to the left, such as arts and humanities.”

Wickham Clayton, lecturer in film production at the University for the Creative Arts in Farnham said that while it is “absolutely essential” to show solidarity with Muslims and US citizens affected by the ban, it is also important to show solidarity with the U.S. academic community “under fire” from anti-intellectualism.

“Boycotting academic conferences may be leaving academic colleagues out to drift who desperately need support,” he said.

Instead, he suggested that scholars could support and attend academic conferences in the U.S. “with the provision that each conference we support and attend sets aside time to plan or take action” to oppose the bans.

“I truly believe that any kind of boycott would be damaging to academic credibility in the U.S., and we should create solutions which show solidarity with them as well as the Muslim population targeted by these horrible and illegal orders,” he added.

“While the needs of marginalized Muslim people, and let’s face it, anyone not white, is more important than the needs of academics, I’d like to think we are smart, strong, and creative enough to generate solutions that help everyone.”

However, Dr Richardson said such a response “wouldn’t be public,” would only be possible for academics able to enter the U.S. and “doesn’t cost academics anything personally.”

“We would still get a line on our CV saying that we had attended an international academic conference,” he said.

Louis Bayham, lecturer in film at the University of Southampton, added that “our first priority has to be with our persecuted colleagues in what is proving to be a perhaps pivotal moment for global humanity.”

Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, professor in global thought and comparative philosophies at Soas, University of London, said that he will cancel a lecture tour of the U.S. about his forthcoming book on the current politics of xenophobia and division if “the current situation prevails.”

“I will not expose myself to a belligerent, xenophobic and uneducated political context in the United States. I think this executive order anti-cultural and discriminatory, bordering on racism,” he said.

Short URL:

Leave a Reply

Keep in Touch With AdjunctNation

Graphic Graphic Graphic


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.



From the Archive

  • Active Learning vs. Lecturing in the College Classroom

    by Paul T. Corrigan One often hears of active learning as a new approach. In contrast, lecturing is the traditional method. Those who support active learning consider it an innovation. Those who do not consider it “another in a long line of educational fads,” as Michael Prince notes. The sequence and chronology remain undisputed either way. Lecturing came first. It has […]

  • Ban PowerPoint in Lectures? Yes! Here’s Why

    by Bent Meier Sørensen Any university teacher who does not harbor a painful recollection of a failed lecture is a liar. On one such occasion, I felt early on that I had lost the students entirely: those who hadn’t sunk into comatose oblivion were listless and anxious. Ungracefully, I threw myself even deeper into my PowerPoint […]

  • Resources for Finding Work Abroad

    by Melissa Doak Looking for international work can be daunting—and downright frustrating without good resources. Fortunately, there are now many useful guides for job searches in almost any field or discipline in almost any country. However, you won’t find many of these published resources in your local bookstore. Some of the best guides, published by […]

  • Korean Part-Timers Will Get Better Pay & Benefits Thanks to New Legislation

      Part-time lecturers at universities nationwide will be given the same status as the regular teaching staff under a new plan of the Presidential Committee on Social Cohesion, in conjunction with the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. The plan, announced Monday, now goes to the National Assembly. Their treatment became an issue in June […]

  • We Need a New Way to Teach Economics

    by John Komlos, PhD Remember the walkout of students from their Principles of Economics class at Harvard a couple of years ago in solidarity with the ‘Occupy” movement? They thought that the economics they were being taught was doctrinaire, failed to provide a balanced perspective on the real existing economy, and did not show sufficient […]


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.

Recently Commented

  • Scott: I believe Sami is correct in that this no reasonable assurance language will allow adjuncts continuing access...
  • Nancy West-Diangelo: It’s as if we’ve lost the ability to listen critically. If the point of the work we...
  • Freddi-Jo Bruschke: An excellent description of this editorial.
  • Julia Holcomb: Tolerance certainly doesn’t mean you get to say things you cannot prove, about things that ought...
  • Michele Spino Martindill: White supremacy has had hundreds of years to dominate campus environments and doesn’t...