Mushrooming Student Debt Becomes A Hot-Button Political Issue. Should It?

by Josh Boak

The White House and Democratic lawmakers are scrambling to find funds to stop an expected doubling of student loan interest rates this summer, arguing that they’re heading off another potential blow to the economy.

But the new House GOP budget doesn’t include the $6 billion needed.

The Democratic strategy consists of shame and politics: Their way, they say, will save thousands of dollars for college students who already are swimming in debt. And if the Democratic lawmakers don’t get their way, parents signing tuition checks will be hearing about it ahead of the election.

“It will be a very potent issue, certainly on college campuses but definitely for students’ parents who are going through the financial aid process on the eve of the election,” said Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.), who is sponsoring a bill backed by 109 Democrats to hold the rates down on the government-subsidized Stafford loans.

House Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-Minn.) says that though he’d like to reduce college costs, paying for the loans with deficit spending isn’t the right way to go — and the only alternative would take away from other programs in his own budget for higher education financing.

So Courtney said Democrats are aiming to move a bill through the Senate to force the House’s hand. Among the options is Sen. Jack Reed’s (D-R.I.) measure to set interest rates on Stafford loans at the current 3.4 percent.

Student loans tap in to the broader Democratic message about economic fairness. At a time when the Federal Reserve is basically giving banks money for free, Treasury bonds are being sold at 2 percent and mortgage rates are 3.8 percent, Democrats say it’s outrageous to make college students pay 6.8 percent.

Nor can private student debt be wiped away by bankruptcy. Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), in addition to backing Reed’s bill on interest rates, is sponsoring a measure to change that.

“Right now, we are facing a student debt bomb,” Durbin said. “We are moving to the equivalent of the subprime mortgage mess in student loans and we can’t make it any worse.”

The debt has ballooned past $1 trillion, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced last month. More than 37 million graduates and dropouts owe money.

“That number has gotten so big, it comes with actual consequences,” said Rich Williams, the higher education advocate for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. “The amount of debt they have impacts important life decisions, like buying a home, whether they get married and have children.”

If the Stafford loan rates double, an average borrower would pay an additional $2,800 over the course of a decade, while someone who maxed out the available subsidized loans would owe an additional $5,000, Williams said.

Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney indicated at an Ohio campaign stop last month that the era of government loans and grants for education should end. “It would be popular for me to stand up and say, ‘I’m going to give you government money to pay for your college,’ but I’m not going to promise that,” he said. “And don’t expect the government to forgive the debt that you take on.”

The issue has not always been highly partisan, since 77 House Republicans — including 46 current House members — supported the 2007 conference report that lowered the interest rates and President George W. Bush signed it.

But five years later, Republicans say their concern is the trillion-dollar deficit. So to address the rising tuition costs without aggravating the federal debt load, the House passed a measure in February to limit regulation of higher education.

And to maintain the cheap loans, another higher-ed program would have to face the chopping block, said Jennifer Allen, a spokeswoman for the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

“We are continuing discussions on action to help borrowers and ease the college cost burden for students and families,” Allen said. “Tackling the challenge of the Stafford loan interest rate increase will require tough choices.”

Democratic Hill staffers said their goal is to find offsets outside the higher-ed budget, but going that route requires support that has yet to materialize from the House Republican leadership.

All of this might leave the solution bowing more to basic political considerations.

“We’ve always seen student aid as a way to buy votes, or not to appear to be working against the middle class,” said Neal McCluskey, associate director of the Center for Educational Freedom at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. “People of both major parties will continually vote to increase student aid, even if they know the realities, because no one wants to appear to be the bad guy.”

This piece appeared originally in It is used here with permission.


Short URL:

Leave a Reply

Keep in Touch With AdjunctNation

Graphic Graphic Graphic


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.



From the Archive

  • SEIU Uses Organizing Strategy Developed in DC To Organize Boston’s PTers

    by Mariah Quinn “We said yes.” That was the consensus of a group of over 100 adjunct professors after a day of panels and discussions about organizing contingent faculty in the Boston metro area to raise standards for their profession. The event was held at the John F. Kennedy Library in Boston on Saturday, and […]

  • Michigan House Republicans Pass Bill That Strips Grad. Students of Right to Unionize

    Governor Rick Snyder has repeatedly claimed he has no interest in starting a Right-To-Work war in Michigan. Whether he has been telling the truth may become very clear, very soon. The Michigan House quickly approved SB 0971, legislation that bans the unionization of graduate student research assistants (GSRA) at public universities. There was no debate […]

  • Best of the Web: Distance Education Resources

    by Vicki Urquhart ON-LINE EDUCATION HAS been around long enough for us to know that for students to be successful they should possess certain traits or skills, such as self-motivation, determination, time-management skills, and a high comfort level with technology. In turn, on-line instructors need these same skills; the presence of good technical support in […]

  • Hybrid Courses

    by Evelyn Beck As distance education evolves from a totally on-line environment plagued by higher-than-average attrition rates, more options may make it easier for students to find the right match for the way they learn best. And many advocates say that increasingly popular hybrid courses may be the ideal approach to combine the best features […]

  • One Man’s Mission To Bring the Gospel According to SEIU To DC Adjuncts

    by Kelly McDonald In 2008, Kip Lornell wrote a piece for AdjunctNation about his seven-year effort to help his colleagues at George Washington University to unionize: It took me the same number of years (seven-and-a-half) to earn a B.S., M.A., and Ph.D. as it did to help organize the part-time faculty The George Washington University […]


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.


Want to see your advertisement on Click here.

Recently Commented

  • Dr. Jim Sass: I can’t even imagine $9K per course. I have been teaching at my college for 15 years and only...
  • Hal: This is fantastic news!!! $9000 per course is a good middle class wage for the PT faculty. I didn’t hear...
  • Michelle Ryan: So Barnard is offering less than the national average per course pay? Shame on the administration.
  • Audrey Cody: Very creative and enjoyable
  • Nancy Collins: Students will be faced with reality once they leave college. The kindness Prof. Muhammad feels he...