Graphic
|

Is Google Destroying Higher Education?

melissaBy Melissa Miller, Ed.D., M.Ed.

I just read a great book. It’s titled, “The Googlization of Everything,” by Siva Vaidhyanathan and it discusses the impacts of Google technology on our world. Of particular interest to me were the chapters about the impact of Google on higher education, students, and scholarship. The book focuses on both positive and negative impacts of this phenomenon that have changed the way we think and behave when searching. (Intesrestingly, as I was writing this blog, I saw on the news how Congress is currently holding hearings with the Google executives about the effects of their power and dominance.)

After reading this book, I thought about the impact of Google on my teaching and student learning. I have noted behavioral changes in the way students approach information. In some aspects, this is positive – students feel confident they can find the answer to any question within seconds. For social and personal aspects, this is great. Information at our fingertips – how could that be bad? Well, I don’t think it is unless we are talking about scholarly or academic research. I’m finding students think they can simply ask Google anything and the results serve as appropriate for the classroom or writing. I ask: When did researching become searching?

How many of our students simply rely on Google instead of learning the information themselves? (Why memorize or absorb the material when I can look it up nearly as quickly?) How many use it as their main search tool, versus a school library or scholarly journal database? Conversely, how many of us use Google to quickly and easily determine sources of possible plagiarism? The very technology they are relying on to make their lives easier makes it easier for us to catch them in the act! Vaidhyantthan summarizes: “the notions of ‘library’ and ‘Internet’ have merged significantly for university students in the United States.” This is not necessarily a bad thing, per se, but it does impact the way we teach. In a personal context, how often to we say, “I’ll Google it!”? Quite a bit. But professionally, I don’t rely on Google, unless I am chasing down the aforementioned plagiarism case, and it is important students understand this difference.

One course I teach involves students to research and synthesize information using outside support. Term after term, my students struggle with this. They have difficulty blending their analysis with outside support. Before we even get to that stage, however, I have found students have trouble with the basic research part of the assignment. I now devote at least one class session to how to use the school library and online databases to effectively search for information. (First we have to define what constitutes a scholarly article, peer-reviewed journal, etc.) Students are often impatient when the article or information does not simply pop up for them immediately (as in a Google search). They tend to click only on the top search returns, and then are easily frustrated when more work is involved. I teach them to sift through the information, to be detectives digging through the heap of results. It can be painful, as they are accustomed to a quick and easy return.

After thinking about all of this, a new personal teaching objective I have is to try to blend students’ familiarity and comfort with Google with teaching them how to apply their own filters to information, thus learning how to be discerning Google users.

About the New Adjunct: Dr. Melissa Miller completed her Ed.D. with an emphasis in Teacher Leadership from Walden University. She holds a M.Ed. from Mary Washington University and a B.A. in Interdisciplinary Studies from Virginia Tech. Dr. Miller’s professional and research interests include adult and online learning, professional development, and literacy. Presently, Dr. Miller works as an adjunct instructor and an evaluator, while also enjoying her roles as a wife and mother.

Short URL: http://www.adjunctnation.com/?p=2968

1 Comment for “Is Google Destroying Higher Education?”

  1. To some extend A Big No! But its effect i not good.

Leave a Reply

Keep in Touch With AdjunctNation

Graphic Graphic Graphic

Graphic

Want to see your advertisement on
AdjunctNation.com? Click here.

Graphic

Want to see your advertisement on
AdjunctNation.com? Click here.

Archives

Graphic

From the Archive

  • George Mason U Students Study Their Adjuncts

    Molly Greenberg A new George Mason University study on adjunct faculty may be the “most comprehensive study of one institution’s adjunct faculty working conditions ever.” The report, appropriately named “Indispensable but Invisible,” is based on a survey completed by 241 adjunct at George Mason and conducted by the Public Sociology Association made up of George […]

  • Prairie State College P/Timers Set to Organize

    Part-time instructors at Prairie State College in Illinois said they are confident they will organize into a union. The question is when—and what organization will represent them. A group of about 25 adjunct faculty formed Adjunct Instructors United in May 2004 with the intent of organizing into a union and negotiating a new contract. A […]

  • Black Earth and Ivory Tower

    by Zachary Michael Jack, University of South Carolina Press, 2005. 312 pages. reviewed by Kathleen D. Kelsey Reading Black Earth and Ivory Tower reminds me of why I’m an academic and a hobby gardener and not a full-time farmer. In-between reading the 32 expertly written short essays, I pluck redbud seedlings out of my herb […]

  • The Newsletter That’s All the Rage: A Review of Women in Higher Education

    by Mark J. Drozdowski SHOULD WOMEN WORKING at colleges and universities be enraged? The editors at Women in Higher Education think so. The mission of this monthly newsletter is “to enlighten, encourage, empower, and engage women on campus to win acceptance of women’s styles and values, improving higher education and society.” Its Web site adds […]

  • Distance Education: Getting Started

    by Jo Gibson Adjunct faculty have a wide comfort zone: they prepare lectures, monitor classroom discussion, devise tests, assign grades–no problem! However, even for faculty with wide-ranging professional skills and experience, on-line teaching can be a hard sell. Consider Dr. David Dutton [pseud.], professor and department chair. Aggressively pursuing additional work to supplement his income, […]

    This article is available for purchase for $1.00 if you do not have a subscription. If you do have a subscription, please [login] here to read the entire piece. If you do NOT have a subscription, please 
    Authorize.Net
    Authorize.Net processes AMEX, Visa, Mastercard and Discover credit card payments made online securely and safely. 
    Paypal Standard
    You do NOT need a PayPal account to use this payment method. PayPal allows credit card payments to be processed safely and securely. PayPal operates with credit cards, debit cards, bank accounts and PayPal accounts to make safe purchases online, without disclosing your credit card number or financial information. 

     Subscribe to our newsletter

    to create an account which you will use to access the article you wish to purchase and read.
Graphic

Want to see your advertisement on
AdjunctNation.com? Click here.

Graphic

Want to see your advertisement on
AdjunctNation.com? Click here.

Recently Commented

  • Dr. Jim Sass: I can’t even imagine $9K per course. I have been teaching at my college for 15 years and only...
  • Hal: This is fantastic news!!! $9000 per course is a good middle class wage for the PT faculty. I didn’t hear...
  • Michelle Ryan: So Barnard is offering less than the national average per course pay? Shame on the administration.
  • Audrey Cody: Very creative and enjoyable
  • Nancy Collins: Students will be faced with reality once they leave college. The kindness Prof. Muhammad feels he...